Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Rep. Adrian Smith explains votes on election certification, Jan. 6 commission
editor's pick alert

Rep. Adrian Smith explains votes on election certification, Jan. 6 commission

  • Updated
  • 0

January 6 Commission Is Approved by House , Despite GOP Opposition. The House of Representatives voted to establish a 9/11-type commission to investigate the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. The vote to pass the legislation was 252 to 175, with 35 Republicans joining every Democratic House member for a "yes" vote. It was crafted, in large part, by New York Republican Representative John Katko. This is about facts. It's not partisan politics. We would have never gotten to this point if it was about partisan politics, Rep. John Katko, (R-NY), via CBS News. The legislation seeks to create a bipartisan commission tasked with investigating the events of Jan. 6. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy led outspoken opposition to the bill, which now faces an uphill battle for approval in the Senate. 60 votes are needed for approval of the bill in a Senate that is spilt down the middle, with 50 Republicans and 50 Democrats. While some Republican senators have voiced their support for the bill, Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is in opposition. After careful consideration, I've made the decision to oppose the House Democrats' slanted and unbalanced proposal for another commission to study the events of January 6, Mitch McConnell, (R-KY) Senate Minority Leader, via CBS News. On May 18, former President Donald Trump released a statement referring to the legislation as a "Democrat trap.". Republicans must get much tougher and much smarter, and stop being used by the Radical Left. Hopefully, Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy are listening!, Donald Trump, via CBS News

U.S. Rep. Adrian Smith has split from his fellow House members from Nebraska in at least two high-profile, politically charged moments this year. But it’s not because he thinks President Joe Biden didn’t win the presidency, or because he condones the mob that stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

Adrian Smith official headshot


In a wide-ranging interview Tuesday, Smith offered insight into those votes and detailed priorities for him and the constituents of his sprawling, largely rural 3rd Congressional District.

The Gering congressman was among Republicans who objected to Electoral College votes from two states in January. The votes on objections came hours after a violent mob of supporters of then-President Donald Trump stormed the U.S. Capitol, hoping to overturn the election of Biden.

Trump and other Republicans claimed, without evidence, that there was fraud in the 2020 election.

Those people were “so extreme,” he said, that he didn’t see them as relevant.

“A mob of people does not impact how I vote. And especially extremists that vandalize the Capitol. I realize not everyone who came in might’ve forced their way in or broke their way in, but it was abundantly clear that what took place was inappropriate,” he said, adding it was “dangerous for America” and sends the “absolute wrong message” to adversaries.

Smith separates those events from his objections to the Electoral College certification in two states. Nebraska’s two senators and two other representatives — all Republicans — voted to certify the results in those contested states.

At the time, Smith said that his vote was, in part, a means to air longstanding election concerns. He believes Biden won the 2020 election, he said Tuesday, and isn’t aware of actual vote tallying that would’ve changed the outcome. But he still has concerns, and specifically mentioned Pennsylvania, saying executive action was taken there when the conduct of elections should be legislatively established.

“I’m ready to move forward,” he said. “I mean they’re four-year terms. Let’s focus on the next election in a balanced fashion.”

He also separates his experience on Jan. 6 from his more recent vote against forming an independent commission to investigate those events. In May, he again was in the minority of the state’s delegation in that vote, with Sen. Deb Fischer the only other member of Nebraska’s delegation to vote against forming the bipartisan commission.

Investigations into Jan. 6 are already underway, he said. He wasn’t convinced forming the commission was the right thing to do, calling Speaker Nancy Pelosi “the most divisive speaker in modern history” while voicing doubt she had a balanced effort in mind.

As for why he came to a conclusion that differs from his fellow Nebraskans in the House, Smith said they’re “three different individuals,” who may be member to the same party and work well together, but whose approaches and constituencies differ.

He joins other opponents to that plan, including Nebraska Gov. Pete Ricketts, who has rallied opposition in town hall meetings and has referred to it as a “land grab.” Federal officials, conservationists and a University of Nebraska law professor are among those who recently refuted opponents’ characterization of the plan.

“When you have a proposed tax policy that is very onerous to agriculture, and then another priority of the federal government wanting to control more land, it makes folks nervous,” Smith said.

Looking ahead, Smith, a former state legislator, made clear he isn’t interested in joining the 2022 governor’s race, saying he likes working in the legislative branch. But he aspires to the top Republican spot on the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, which would position him to chair the tax-writing committee should Republicans gain control of the chamber after the 2022 elections.


Get Government & Politics updates in your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


Breaking News